Nov 122010
 

Now the  Monsters have pulled many trout out of this stretch of the Kennebec River right in Solon Maine. We make a trip there every year. There’s a spot known as “rainbow pool” to the locals. Two years ago in fact Monster Kristen hooked into a rainbow right there that took air, so she identified it,  then it proceeded to vaporize her tippet. When she came down she was a bit shaken when she told us that it was the biggest rainbow she had seen. But Anders Olafson gets the free beers tonight for just setting the new Maine State record for a rainbow–8.42 lbs, and caught October 31st right there on the Kennebec in Solon. That is one hog of a rainbow. Cheers!

5:12 PM

Rainbow trout sets record

By Doug Harlow
 

SOLON — A Starks man caught a record-setting rainbow trout in Somerset County — and that’s no fish tale.
Anders Olafson caught the fish on Oct. 31 on the Kennebec River in Solon, according to Deborah Turcotte, spokeswoman from the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
“It’s a state record — it’s a record for weight,” Turcotte said Friday.
The fish was weighed 8.42 pounds and was weighed on a certified scale at the Solon Superette on U.S. Route 201, Turcotte said. The previous state record was caught by Michael Thebarge of Skowhegan on Lake George on Feb. 6, 2009. It weighed 7 pounds.
The Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and Harry Vanderweide, editor of the Maine Sportsman newspaper, jointly announce new records. The publication has maintained the state record book for more than 30 years.

 

Contributed photo RECORD TROUT: Anders Olafson of Starks caught a record 8.42-pound rainbow trout Oct. 3 while fishing on the Kennebec River in Solon. The fish is the heaviest trout caught in Maine, according to a news release from the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and Harry Vanderweide, editor of the Maine Sportsman newspaper. The paper has maintained the state record book for more than 30 years, according to the release.

Mar 152010
 

Maine’s Sen. David Trahan Offers Alternative To Saltwater Fishing License

March 9, 2009

Maine’s Senator David Trahan began an effort to put a stop to the proposal to require Maine residents to purchase a salt water fishing license. You can read more about that here.

The proposal for the license claimed that the license was a way to collect and track data from fishermen who use the resource. Sen. Trahan has come up with an alternative proposal to a license and he needs your help.

The Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine has teamed up with Senator Trahan to promote this alternative. The New England Outdoor Voice has provided a site where you can read a letter that is being sent to the Joint Committee on Marine Resources asking them to consider Trahan’s proposal and why.

If you would like to read the letter and sign you name to send, click this link.

Tom Remington

Written by Tom · Filed Under Fishing Articles, Fishing News 

Jan 162010
 

As of yesterday, Patrick Coan holds the Maine state record for the largest brookie ever caught. At just over nine pounds, he pulled it through the ice on Mousam Lake in Shapleigh. Now I dont know about you but, seeing a nine pound fish looming up through a ten inch hole in the ice, on the end of the line your haul’n on,….would go down as damn good fishing day in my book.   http://www.wcsh6.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=113438

Jan 112010
 

This is a tax,   https://www.countmyfish.noaa.gov/index.html  and it’s coming because  NOAA, and state fishery agencies can’t get the job done with the revenue they already get from us, and now, we recreational saltwater fisherman will be burdened unnecessarily as a result. I would love to know where the numbers thrown up by NOAA relating the impact recreational fisherman have on the oceans fisheries come from. It’s obviously a concoction by various legal, and PR entities enlisted to help justify the budgetary inefficiencies of federal ocean fishery management agencies. The cause is good, the focus ridiculous. The numbers are dismissible in my mind. 

Recreational fisherman, by and large, drop a few lines in the water on occasion, throw back most of what they catch, and some days catch nothing. We all know this. I expect these parameters were absent from any calculation. There is no way any rational person could conclude that recreational fishing serves as a statistically viable measure when it comes to ocean stock levels compared to data already gathered from commercial fishing landing counts. Sure, some fish are taken recreationally, but as a tool, it’s just statistically insignificant compared too commercial fishing whose takes are large, and highly measurable. This is not about lakes, rivers, and streams here that are more significantly impacted by recreational fishing, but about the ocean, and the fishing methods that significantly impact it and are already easily measured. 

The NOAA spin is laughable but understandable. The implications sad. New revenue streams are a quick fix for budgetary inefficiency. Too bad the recreational saltwater fisherman will have to pay in beyond what they already do, for the surveys that are already funded and could work properly. Shame on NOAA for their poorly veiled excuse. No one is going to give a phone survey (most will give their office phone number), and most will throw any mail survey in the recycle bin without opening it. And it’s only because we recreational saltwater fisherman are smart enough to know that we offer no new significant data. But NOAA knows this. The whole exercise is a PR effort that looks ridiculous to the intelligent fisherman—and anyone else thinking rationally. I registered, and will pay my $15 dollars a years in years to come….unless I can bludgeon some sense into my US and state legislators soon… to keep this boondoggle from going through, or at least to make my state exempt…which is possible.., and something we all should strive for. Lets protect and nurture the ocean’s fisheries, and lets do it by making the existing systems we have work properly. 

Just one MOF member’s opinion only, and not reflective (necessarily) of MOF as a whole.